So I took this BBspot survey. Here are my results:
Well, currently I use Linux on Suse or Redhat, but hey, at least its Linux.
So I took this BBspot survey. Here are my results:
Well, currently I use Linux on Suse or Redhat, but hey, at least its Linux.
C.S. Lewis has always been a talented writer. His “Chronicles of Narnia” was one of the first book series I read. His non-fiction literature stands as some of the best Christian material written in the last century. All of that said “Mere Christianity” is probably one of his best books.
The purpose of the book is to introduce non-Christians into the most basic and fundamentals of Christian thought; what C.S. Lewis calls “Mere Christianity”, but the information given is as useful to Christians as non-Christians. It thoroughly and succinctly makes the case for natural law, the existence of God, Christian morality, and the “core” set of beliefs that make Christianity. Almost like a Christian version of “Book of Five Rings.” A book with significantly more wisdom than you would expect in its modest 228 pages.
Although I have read some of Charles Dickens other works; I had never read “A Tale of Two Cities.” My wife had bought the book some time ago and so it sat on our shelf waiting to be read. A classic sitting on my shelf that I had not read was too much of a farce for me to ignore. And so I began reading it in the mornings, on my way to work.
Maybe it was because I was so much younger when I read Dickens other work, but for some reason “Tale” touched me in a way that his other books did not. I do not believe that another author, since the time Shakespeare, has demonstrated such a mastery of the English language and a skill for story telling. “A Tale of Two Cities” read like bitter-sweat honey to my tongue. Sweat, because his words welled up emotions in me that I have not felt for a story in a very long time. Bitter, because my heart aches that I will never have the skill to write such words. How sad it is that very few books have the capacity to be like that. The following are some of my favorite quotes from the book.
The two stand in the fast-thinning throng of victims, but they speak as if they were alone. Eye to eye, voice to voice, hand to hand, heart to heart, these two children of the Universal Mother, else so wide apart and differing, have come together on the dark highway, to repair home together, and to rest in her bosom.
Crush humanity out of shape once more, under similar hammers, and it will twist itself into the same tortured forms. Sow the same seed of rapacious license and oppression over again, and it will surely yield the same fruit according to its kind.
The great grindstone, Earth, had turned when Mr. Lorry looked out again, and the sum was red on the court-yard. But, the lesser grindstone stood alone there in the calm morning air, with a red upon it that the sun had never given, and would never take away.
A dram, all a dream, that ends in nothing, and leaves the sleeper where he lay down, but I wish you to know that you inspired it.
His surname was Cruncher, and on the youthful occasion of his renouncing by proxy the works of darkness, in the easterly parish church of Hounsditch, he had received the added appellation of Jerry.
This article by the AP scares the holy crap out of me. Evidently the Department of Homeland Security (DoHS) feels the part of its job mandate is to enforce patent and trademark rules on US citizens. Can anyone say “night watch?” Can someone please tell the DoHS that the US economy can take care of itself just fine. If a company is worried about a trademark infringement, they can do the same thing the rest of us would do; go to the courts to have it resolved. Unfortunately the focus of the article is on the fact that the patent had expired (making the DoHS look stupid) but the real focus of the article should be; exactly what business does the DoHS have pursuing trademark enforcement?
SMTM is a perl/Tk stock ticker and chart display application for tracking stocks. The stock information is downloaded via Yahoo Finance.
Found an amazing document published by Connectiva on their revision control infrastructure an how they manage it. Open Source projects have very few developers for the number of applications and the size of code-base they use. Reuse and efficiency is required if a project of any size is to be managed. CVS and Subversion (SVN) are two of the tools use to manage these projects; and their scriptability, flexability, functionality, and manageability are paramount to making this work.
Also, here is a list of KDE CVS keywords for bugzilla management. They allow you to open bug reports, close bug reports, add features, mark GUI changes, and cc bug reports based on keywords in you CVS commit comments. These entries also effect changelog entires for packages when they are released.
Couple quick tutorials that I have been looking at:
The software industry is in a state of rapid change. The global connectivity provided by the Internet has put a damper on the ever archaic distribution and licensing methods of commercial software vendors. This article by David Adams give a spectacular overview of the history of the software industry and the direction it is going.
A common rant of my concerns the mind numbing understanding the most tech writers (actually this applies to most periodical writers in general) have about the concept of system security. This “everything I ever needed to know about computer security I learned from watching Hackers” is frustrating when so much good information is available about computer security.
The problem is only exacerbated by the fact that some organizations actively work to change the definition of security to their suite own benefit. That is why I point out this article from the Register. It is one of the best “general understanding” security papers on Linux I have read in a while. The concepts it covers can generally be applied to all Unix-type OS’s, but the article talks about Linux (as well as Apache) in particular. Read it and you will know more about software security for Linux than many in the computer business.
Physics Web reports the results of their questionnaire for greatest equations ever. My picks would predictively have been Euler’s equation (eiπ + 1 = 0) or Einstein’s (E = mc2 ). Also popular was the first equation almost everyone learns, 1 + 1 = 2.